Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Tayko
Case Digest: Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Margarito E. Tayko, et al.
G.R. No.: 231546
Date: March 29, 2023
Ponente: J. Gaerlan
Facts:
The case involves a dispute over the valuation of a property acquired by the government under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP). The property owners, respondents Margarito E. Tayko, et al., claimed that the valuation made by the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) was not in accordance with the law and implementing rules.
The property was acquired by the government under a voluntary offer to sell, and the LBP valued the property based on the formula provided under Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 27. However, the Court of Appeals (CA) ruled that the valuation should be based on the factors enumerated in Section 17 of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 6657.
Read more: Just Compensation in Agrarian Reform: Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Tayko
Doctrine of Agency by Estoppel Applied: Chevron Philippines, Inc. v. Looyuko
The case digest for Chevron Philippines, Inc. vs. Alberto T. Looyuko (doing business under the name and style "Noah's Ark Group of Companies") and his heirs, Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery, Inc., Achilles "Kelly" L. Pacquing, Julieta "Juliet" T. Go, and the Heirs of Teresita C. Looyuko is as follows:
G.R. No.: 236525 March 29, 2023
Ponente: J. Gaerlan
Facts:
Petitioner Chevron Philippines, Inc. filed a complaint against respondents for the payment of outstanding obligations amounting to ₱7,381,510.70, plus interest and attorney's fees. The petitioner alleged that the respondents purchased petroleum products and services from them, which were covered by 105 invoices. The respondents denied liability, claiming that they did not enter into any agreement with the petitioner and that the deliveries were not authorized.
Read more: Doctrine of Agency by Estoppel Applied: Chevron Philippines, Inc. v. Looyuko
Ombudsman's Dismissal of Charges Against BFP Official Upholds Standard of Grave Abuse of Discretion
G.R. Nos. 225204-05 March 29, 2023
Case Digest: F/Dir. Rogelio F. Asignado (Ret.), et al. vs. Office of the Ombudsman, et al.
D E C I S I O N
GAERLAN, J.:
Facts:
Petitioners, officers and members of the Board of Trustees of the Bureau of Fire Protection Mutual Aid & Beneficiary Association, Inc. (BFPMBAI), filed a complaint against private respondent F/CSupt. Carlito S. Romero, alleging that he committed grave misconduct, oppression, and grave abuse of authority by withholding the remittance of deductions from the salaries of BFP personnel, which were intended for BFPMBAI. Private respondent claimed that he was justified in withholding the remittance due to a controversy over the legitimacy of the BFPMBAI Board of Trustees.
Eminent Domain and Unlawful Taking: Supreme Court Provides Guidance
G.R. No. 197743. October 18, 2022
Case Digest
Heirs of Jose Mariano and Helen S. Mariano vs. City of Naga
R E S O L U T I O N: DIMAAMPAO, J.:
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION: GAERLAN, J.:
Facts
The petitioners, Heirs of Jose Mariano and Helen S. Mariano, and Heirs of Erlinda Mariano-Villanueva, filed a complaint for unlawful detainer against the City of Naga, respondent, over a 5-hectare parcel of land covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 671. The City of Naga claimed ownership of the property through a Deed of Donation executed by the registered owners, Macario Mariano and Jose A. Gimenez, in 1954.
Read more: Eminent Domain and Unlawful Taking: Supreme Court Provides Guidance
Public Officials on Notice: Supreme Court Decision Highlights Importance of Diligence in Disbursing Public Funds
G.R. Nos. 243029-30. August 22, 2022
Case Digest: Tito S. Sarion vs. People of the Philippines
RESOLUTION
GAERLAN, J.:
Facts
Tito S. Sarion, the petitioner, was convicted by the Sandiganbayan of Malversation of Public Funds under Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC) and violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 3019. The conviction stemmed from Sarion's approval of a disbursement voucher for the payment of price escalation to Markbilt Construction, despite the absence of appropriation and non-compliance with the requirements of Section 61 of R.A. No. 9184 or the Government Procurement Reform Act.
More Articles ...
- Loan Agreements and Foreclosure Sales: Supreme Court Provides Guidance on Conscionability and Validity
- Right to Privacy vs. Protection of Minors: Supreme Court Rules on Child Pornography Case
- Public Domain vs. Public Dominion: A Nuanced Look at Philippine Land Law
- A Contract to Sell is a bilateral contract where the seller retains ownership of the property until full payment of the purchase price